Relevant for Exams
Mamata writes to CEC, alleging harassment of Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen during electoral roll verification.
Summary
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee wrote to the Chief Election Commissioner, alleging harassment of Nobel Laureate Prof. Amartya Sen by ECI officials during electoral roll verification. This incident raises questions about the Election Commission's procedures and the challenges faced by citizens, even eminent ones, during the Summary Revision (SIR) process. It is significant for understanding the functioning of constitutional bodies like the ECI and electoral processes for competitive exams.
Key Points
- 1West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee addressed a letter to the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC).
- 2The letter highlighted the alleged harassment of Nobel Laureate Prof. Amartya Sen.
- 3Prof. Amartya Sen, a nonagenarian, was asked to appear before Election Commission of India (ECI) officials.
- 4The purpose of the ECI officials' request was to establish Prof. Sen's credentials for electoral roll verification.
- 5The incident occurred during the process of Summary Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
In-Depth Analysis
The incident involving Nobel Laureate Prof. Amartya Sen and the Election Commission of India (ECI) officials, as highlighted by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, offers a critical lens through which to examine the intricacies of India's electoral process, the functioning of its constitutional bodies, and the rights of its citizens. This event, where an eminent nonagenarian was allegedly asked to 'establish his credentials' during electoral roll verification, brings to the fore significant questions about bureaucratic procedures and their human impact.
**Background Context and What Happened:**
The Election Commission of India (ECI) is constitutionally mandated under Article 324 to superintend, direct, and control the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of all elections to Parliament and State Legislatures. A crucial part of this mandate is the periodic revision of electoral rolls to ensure they are accurate, updated, and reflect the current demographic reality. This process often includes a 'Summary Revision' (SIR), where draft rolls are published, and citizens are invited to file claims and objections. Booth Level Officers (BLOs) are typically tasked with door-to-door verification to identify deceased voters, shifted voters, and new eligible voters. The alleged incident involved ECI officials (presumably BLOs or their superiors) asking Prof. Amartya Sen to appear before them to verify his details, a request that was perceived as harassment given his advanced age and global stature. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's letter to the Chief Election Commissioner expressed 'profound shame' over this treatment, framing it as an unnecessary burden on an eminent citizen.
**Key Stakeholders Involved:**
1. **Election Commission of India (ECI):** As the primary constitutional body responsible for electoral integrity, the ECI is at the center. Its role is to ensure accurate voter lists and a fair election process. The incident questions the sensitivity and appropriateness of its field-level procedures, especially concerning vulnerable populations like the elderly.
2. **Prof. Amartya Sen:** A globally renowned Nobel Laureate and economist, his involvement elevates the issue from a routine administrative matter to one of national and international discussion. His age (nonagenarian) makes the alleged demand for personal appearance particularly problematic.
3. **Mamata Banerjee (Chief Minister, West Bengal):** As a prominent political leader, her intervention brings political scrutiny to the ECI's actions. Her letter highlights concerns about citizen harassment and potentially politicizes an administrative process, raising questions about Centre-State dynamics and the autonomy of constitutional bodies.
4. **Citizens/Voters:** The broader electorate is a key stakeholder. The ease or difficulty of electoral roll revision directly impacts their fundamental right to vote. Incidents like this can erode public trust in the electoral system if not addressed transparently.
**Why This Matters for India:**
This incident is significant for several reasons. Firstly, it underscores the paramount importance of **electoral roll accuracy** for the health of India's democracy. Inaccurate rolls can lead to disenfranchisement or the inclusion of ineligible voters, both of which undermine the democratic process. Secondly, it highlights the need for **citizen-centric governance** and sensitive application of rules. While verification is necessary, the method should be respectful and considerate, especially for the elderly or those with disabilities. The Representation of the People Act, 1950, which governs the preparation and revision of electoral rolls, emphasizes accuracy. Thirdly, it tests the **accountability and independence of constitutional bodies** like the ECI. While independent, the ECI must remain responsive to public concerns and ensure its procedures are fair and non-discriminatory. Finally, such incidents can fuel **political discourse** on electoral reforms and the conduct of elections, especially in politically charged states like West Bengal.
**Historical Context and Future Implications:**
Historically, electoral roll revisions have often been contentious, with allegations of politically motivated deletions or inclusions. Efforts have been made over the years, including the introduction of Electors Photo Identity Cards (EPICs) in 1993, to streamline and verify voter identity. The ECI has also leveraged technology for roll management, including online applications and databases. However, the human element of verification remains crucial. The future implications of this incident could include a review by the ECI of its guidelines for verifying the credentials of eminent citizens or the elderly, potentially allowing for alternative verification methods (e.g., through family members, affidavits, or designated representatives) to prevent undue hardship. It might also spur greater public debate on balancing stringent verification with ease of participation, especially as India's population ages. The incident could further emphasize the need for continuous training and sensitization of BLOs to ensure respectful and efficient service delivery, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process while upholding citizen dignity.
**Related Constitutional Articles, Acts, or Policies:**
* **Article 324 of the Indian Constitution:** Vests the superintendence, direction, and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections in the Election Commission.
* **Representation of the People Act, 1950:** Deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls, including qualifications of voters, delimitation of constituencies, and administrative machinery for elections.
* **Representation of the People Act, 1951:** Deals with the actual conduct of elections, administrative machinery, political parties, and election disputes.
* **Electoral Registration Officers Rules, 1960:** Provide detailed procedures for the preparation and revision of electoral rolls.
Exam Tips
This topic falls under 'Indian Polity and Governance' (UPSC GS-II) and 'General Awareness' for SSC/Banking/State PSC exams. Focus on the constitutional provisions related to the Election Commission of India (Article 324) and the Representation of the People Acts (1950 & 1951).
Study the functions and powers of the ECI comprehensively, including its role in electoral roll revision, delimitation, and conduct of elections. Understand the difference between constitutional and statutory bodies.
Be prepared for analytical questions on electoral reforms, challenges faced by the ECI, and the balance between electoral integrity and citizen convenience. Factual questions might ask about the composition of the ECI or key provisions of the RPA Acts.
Connect this incident to broader themes like citizen's rights, good governance, and the accountability of constitutional bodies. Consider how such events impact public trust in democratic institutions.
Familiarize yourself with the process of electoral roll revision (Summary Revision, Special Revision) and the role of Booth Level Officers (BLOs). Questions may test your understanding of these ground-level electoral mechanisms.
Related Topics to Study
Full Article
It is a matter of profound shame that Nobel Laureate Prof. Amartya Sen-a nonagenarian and a globally respected intellectual, has been asked to appear before ECI officials to establish his credentials, Ms . Banerjee wrote in the letter

