Kashmiri vendors harassed and threatened in two separate incidents in Haryana

The reported incidents of harassment and threats against Kashmiri vendors in Haryana, particularly the forced chanting of 'Vande Mataram' in Kaithal's Kalayat, bring to the forefront critical questions about national integration, the safety of inter-state migrants, and the upholding of fundamental rights in India. These incidents are not isolated occurrences but reflect deeper societal prejudices and a complex socio-political landscape.

To understand the background context, one must consider the historical narrative surrounding Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). The abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A on August 5, 2019, by the Union Government, which granted special status to J&K, significantly altered the region's constitutional relationship with the rest of India. While the government's stated aim was greater integration, it also led to heightened scrutiny and, in some cases, suspicion towards Kashmiris in various parts of the country. Economically, many Kashmiris, particularly those involved in traditional crafts like selling shawls, dry fruits, or handicrafts, travel across India for their livelihood, often encountering varying degrees of acceptance or hostility. This economic necessity makes them vulnerable targets.

The incidents in Haryana involved local men confronting Kashmiri vendors, demanding they chant 'Vande Mataram' and issuing threats. Such acts are often fueled by a misguided sense of hyper-nationalism, a lack of understanding of the diverse cultural fabric of India, and sometimes, outright prejudice. The perpetrators often believe they are asserting national pride, but in reality, they are infringing upon individual liberties and fostering an environment of fear.

Key stakeholders in this scenario include, first and foremost, the **Kashmiri vendors** themselves, who are the direct victims. They are often economically marginalized individuals seeking to earn an honest living, far from their homes, and are vulnerable to such intimidation. Second, the **local residents and perpetrators** represent a segment of society influenced by prevailing narratives, sometimes acting out of ignorance, communal bias, or a distorted sense of patriotism. Third, the **Haryana State Government and its law enforcement agencies** are crucial stakeholders, as they bear the primary responsibility for maintaining law and order, ensuring the safety of all citizens, and preventing such incidents. Their swift and impartial action is vital. Fourth, the **Union Government** also has a significant stake, as these incidents impact national integration, communal harmony, and the perception of India's commitment to constitutional values. Finally, **civil society organizations and human rights activists** play an important role in documenting these incidents, advocating for the victims, and promoting social harmony.

These incidents matter profoundly for India. They challenge the very idea of **national integration**, which mandates that all citizens, regardless of their origin, can live and work freely anywhere in the country. Such harassment undermines the spirit of 'Ek Bharat, Shreshtha Bharat' (One India, Great India). More critically, they constitute direct violations of several **Fundamental Rights** enshrined in the Indian Constitution. **Article 19(1)(d) and (e)** guarantee the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and reside and settle in any part thereof. **Article 19(1)(g)** ensures the right to practice any profession or carry on any occupation, trade, or business. The forced chanting and threats infringe upon **Article 21**, the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to live with dignity. Furthermore, such discriminatory actions can be seen as a violation of **Article 15**, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of place of birth. When citizens from one part of the country are targeted in another, it erodes trust and fosters alienation, particularly in a region as sensitive as Kashmir.

Historically, post-partition, India adopted a constitutional framework that emphasized unity in diversity, ensuring freedom of movement and residence. Incidents like these, however, reflect a persistent challenge to this ideal, often exacerbated by political rhetoric and social media narratives. The post-abrogation period of Article 370 has sometimes seen a rise in anti-Kashmiri sentiment in certain segments, leading to such unfortunate episodes.

The future implications are significant. If left unaddressed, such incidents can deepen the sense of alienation among Kashmiris, making them feel like second-class citizens in their own country. This could deter them from seeking economic opportunities outside J&K, further impacting their livelihoods and potentially feeding into separatist narratives. It also poses a serious law and order challenge, as unchecked vigilantism can spiral into larger communal tensions. For the state, it means a failure to uphold the rule of law and protect its citizens. There is an urgent need for robust state action, including prompt investigation, prosecution of perpetrators, and public messaging from political leaders condemning such acts. Promoting awareness about cultural diversity and the constitutional rights of all citizens through educational campaigns and community outreach can also help foster a more inclusive environment. Ultimately, these incidents serve as a stark reminder of the continuous effort required to build a truly integrated and harmonious India, where every citizen can live without fear and with dignity.

Relevant constitutional provisions include Articles 14 (Equality before law), 15 (Prohibition of discrimination), 19 (Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.), and 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty). Additionally, relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) pertaining to intimidation, unlawful assembly, and promoting enmity between different groups could be applicable in prosecuting perpetrators.